<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Paul Jacobson - Latest Comments in A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.disqus.com/</link><description>blogger. evangelist. maven</description><atom:link href="https://pauljacobson.disqus.com/a_case_of_cybersquatting_and_facebook/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:23:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-1673854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I reckon the Man is a Genius! I hope he makes tons of cash!! Looks like a legit operation with a CLEVER IDEA!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:23:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-5859340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I reckon the Man is a Genius! I hope he makes tons of cash!! Looks like a legit operation with a CLEVER IDEA!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:23:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-1673852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tom, it isn't necessary for Facebook to register a trademark in SA to qualify for protection.  It would obviously help but it isn't essential.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andre, I think you are right.  If Facebook really had an issue with this guy they I am sure the first step would be a demand letter.  This stuff is all theoretical for the purposes of this post really.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-5859338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tom, it isn't necessary for Facebook to register a trademark in SA to qualify for protection.  It would obviously help but it isn't essential.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andre, I think you are right.  If Facebook really had an issue with this guy they I am sure the first step would be a demand letter.  This stuff is all theoretical for the purposes of this post really.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-1673851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hmmm, I hear you Paul, but then again - it looks like he is trying to put together something that offers actual value. I'm no legal expert but surely if Facebook have an issue with what he is doing they'd have to send him some kind of cease and desist request before going all legal on him?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndreSC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 03:28:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-5859337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hmmm, I hear you Paul, but then again - it looks like he is trying to put together something that offers actual value. I'm no legal expert but surely if Facebook have an issue with what he is doing they'd have to send him some kind of cease and desist request before going all legal on him?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndreSC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 03:28:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-1673850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is facebook registered trademark in South Africa ? Anybody has right to register any domain that is available. I heard that &lt;a href="http://sex.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="sex.com"&gt;sex.com&lt;/a&gt; was sold for 2Million$ , very profitable cybersquating&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 03:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-5859336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is facebook registered trademark in South Africa ? Anybody has right to register any domain that is available. I heard that &lt;a href="http://sex.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="sex.com"&gt;sex.com&lt;/a&gt; was sold for 2Million$ , very profitable cybersquating&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 03:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-1673849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Andre&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All Chris has done is stave off a passing off action.  The use of the domain is still a bit of a sham.  He must have noticed the chatter about his domain and put up the blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 01:08:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-5859335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Andre&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All Chris has done is stave off a passing off action.  The use of the domain is still a bit of a sham.  He must have noticed the chatter about his domain and put up the blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 01:08:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-1673848</link><description>&lt;p&gt;update, he/they've put up a kind of facebook fan blog  in the last few hours. Interesting that they don't expose their identity in the blog, not even links to their/his facebook profile - if they are such huge addicts I'd like to have a squiz at those profiles and history :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndreSC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:39:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A case of cybersquatting and Facebook</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2007/07/04/a-case-of-cybersquatting-and-facebook/#comment-5859334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;update, he/they've put up a kind of facebook fan blog  in the last few hours. Interesting that they don't expose their identity in the blog, not even links to their/his facebook profile - if they are such huge addicts I'd like to have a squiz at those profiles and history :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndreSC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:39:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>