<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Paul Jacobson - Latest Comments in Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.disqus.com/</link><description>blogger. evangelist. maven</description><atom:link href="https://pauljacobson.disqus.com/digital_signatures_and_contracts_in_south_africa/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:35:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/11/22/digital-signatures-and-contracts-in-south-africa/#comment-5858344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree although I heard that the Post Office was charged with issuing advanced electronic signatures ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:35:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/11/22/digital-signatures-and-contracts-in-south-africa/#comment-1672649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree although I heard that the Post Office was charged with issuing advanced electronic signatures ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:35:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/11/22/digital-signatures-and-contracts-in-south-africa/#comment-5858343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My name is Gideon and I am a e-law consultant (inter alia). It seems that altough the ECT act has legalized e-signatures it has not yet found application in practice. The next big wave of law and start ups will be the the first commpanies who get and apply advanced e- signatures.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GIDEON PETRUS BOUWER</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 06:40:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/11/22/digital-signatures-and-contracts-in-south-africa/#comment-1672648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My name is Gideon and I am a e-law consultant (inter alia). It seems that altough the ECT act has legalized e-signatures it has not yet found application in practice. The next big wave of law and start ups will be the the first commpanies who get and apply advanced e- signatures.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GIDEON PETRUS BOUWER</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 06:40:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/11/22/digital-signatures-and-contracts-in-south-africa/#comment-1672647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for dropping by.  I think the Act that deals with this sort of thing more appropriately is the ECT Act and not so much the EC Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As I read the ECT Act, it lays a decent groundwork for where we need to go.  There are probably a couple areas where the Act can be improved and beefed up but I think it is sufficient to help us achieve what we want to achieve as far as shifting to digital communications is concerned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:23:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/11/22/digital-signatures-and-contracts-in-south-africa/#comment-5858342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for dropping by.  I think the Act that deals with this sort of thing more appropriately is the ECT Act and not so much the EC Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As I read the ECT Act, it lays a decent groundwork for where we need to go.  There are probably a couple areas where the Act can be improved and beefed up but I think it is sufficient to help us achieve what we want to achieve as far as shifting to digital communications is concerned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:23:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/11/22/digital-signatures-and-contracts-in-south-africa/#comment-1672646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Duncan mentioned your blog on this at &lt;a href="http://www.theforumsa.co.za/forums/showthread.php?t=506" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theforumsa.co.za/forums/showthread.php?t=506"&gt;http://www.theforumsa.co.za...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;It piqued my interest as I'm seeing increasing levels of legislation that are dealing with electronic media over and above the requirements of the ECA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've commented on the Electronic Tax Invoice requirements from SARS, but as I recall the Publications Act is also stamping on this turf too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the ECA was meant to resolve all these issues, does this mean that the ECA leaves much to be desired?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave A</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:59:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital signatures and contracts in South Africa</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2006/11/22/digital-signatures-and-contracts-in-south-africa/#comment-5858341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Duncan mentioned your blog on this at &lt;a href="http://www.theforumsa.co.za/forums/showthread.php?t=506" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theforumsa.co.za/forums/showthread.php?t=506"&gt;http://www.theforumsa.co.za...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;It piqued my interest as I'm seeing increasing levels of legislation that are dealing with electronic media over and above the requirements of the ECA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've commented on the Electronic Tax Invoice requirements from SARS, but as I recall the Publications Act is also stamping on this turf too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the ECA was meant to resolve all these issues, does this mean that the ECA leaves much to be desired?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave A</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:59:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>